Pickleball Soreness? What Red Light Therapy Can Really Do

Yes, red light therapy may support your recovery after a demanding pickleball session. Research on exercise recovery suggests that photobiomodulation may be associated with less post-exercise muscle soreness and may support muscle performance the following day. That makes it an appealing addition to a recovery routine when your legs feel heavy, your shoulders are tired, or your forearm feels overworked from gripping the paddle.

A long pickleball session can feel fine until the next morning. Then the stairs seem steeper, your legs feel worked over, and the thought of another game is less exciting than it was the day before. Sleep, hydration, sensible rest, and gradual training are still the basics. Red light therapy is one more option players are exploring to feel ready for their next session.

Red and near-infrared light are used to influence biological processes in tissue. The results are not guaranteed, and the best timing and dose depend on the device and the goal. Still, the research is encouraging enough to ask a practical question: could red light therapy support recovery from ordinary pickleball soreness, and how is that different from using it alongside care for an actual injury?

Pickleball can cause next-day soreness because it combines repeated starts, stops, lunges, reaches, and strokes over the course of a session. The individual movements may not feel extreme, but the total number of repetitions can add up, especially during several games or a tournament.

Players repeatedly accelerate and decelerate as they move toward the kitchen, retreat for a lob, or chase a wide shot. Those movements load the calves, thighs, hips, feet, and core. Lunging and reaching also challenge balance and place repeated demands on the lower body and shoulder.

The upper body gets its own share of repetition. Serving, driving, dinking, and overhead shots use the forearm, elbow, shoulder, and upper back. A sudden increase in playing time can make those areas feel sore even when there was no single moment of injury.

Age and playing volume matter, too. Pickleball has become especially popular among adults over 50, and lower-extremity injuries are an important part of its injury profile. A 2026 systematic review of 15 studies found that sprains, strains, and fractures were among the most commonly reported lower-extremity injuries. Falls, forward running or lunging, and foot or ankle inversion were common injury mechanisms.

That finding is relevant to prevention, but it does not show that red light therapy treats those injuries. It also helps explain why soreness and injury should not be treated as interchangeable terms.

No. Ordinary post-exercise soreness is different from sudden, persistent, or worsening pain. Soreness often develops gradually after an unfamiliar or demanding session and improves over the next few days. An injury may involve a sharp onset, swelling, weakness, instability, loss of function, or an inability to bear weight.

A sore muscle after several games is not automatically a torn tendon, sprain, or joint problem. Conversely, assuming that every painful area is “just soreness” can delay appropriate care.

Seek professional evaluation for severe pain, significant swelling, suspected fracture, loss of function, inability to bear weight, recurrent symptoms, or pain that persists or worsens. Red light therapy should not be used to mask symptoms so that you can return to play before the underlying problem has been assessed.

Red light therapy, or photobiomodulation, uses selected wavelengths of red or near-infrared light to produce a biological response in tissue. Devices may use light-emitting diodes, lasers, or a combination of both. PBM is non-ionizing light and is different from ultraviolet radiation.

Research protocols vary considerably. Wavelength, irradiance, dose, treatment duration, distance from the skin, timing, and treatment area can all affect the intervention. A small device used over a particular muscle is not automatically equivalent to a large panel used for full-body exposure.

Researchers have proposed that PBM can influence cellular signaling involved in energy metabolism, oxidative stress, inflammatory signaling, and local tissue responses. These mechanisms provide reasons to study PBM, but they do not guarantee a noticeable improvement in soreness or performance.

“Red light therapy” is not one standardized treatment. Results from one study should not be applied to every device or every body area without considering how the treatment was delivered.

PBM may influence biological processes involved in muscle fatigue, soreness, and recovery, but a plausible mechanism is not proof of a clinical benefit. Researchers have studied whether light applied to muscle before or after exercise changes soreness, strength, endurance, fatigue, or other recovery measures.

It is more accurate to say that PBM may affect cellular signaling than to say that red light simply “gives your cells more energy.” A change in a laboratory measure also does not necessarily mean that a player will move better, feel better, or recover faster in everyday life.

The outcome matters. A person may report less soreness without an injury having healed. PBM may also affect a performance test without improving overall recovery. These are separate questions, and the research does not always answer them in the same way.

It may be associated with less exercise-related soreness, but the evidence is low certainty and does not come from pickleball-specific trials. A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis included 19 studies involving 672 participants. It found low-certainty evidence that PBM applied before exercise reduced muscle soreness and improved muscle performance 24 hours after exercise-induced muscle damage.

The result is relevant to pickleball because pickleball also involves repeated muscular effort. It is not proof that PBM will produce the same result after a recreational match. The studies used different exercise tests, devices, doses, treatment areas, and participant groups.

A careful summary is therefore: research in other active populations suggests that certain PBM protocols may help with exercise-related soreness, but researchers have not established how well those findings translate to pickleball.

“Low certainty” does not mean that the treatment is useless. It means the estimate is not reliable enough to support a strong or universal claim. Future research could strengthen, weaken, or change the result.

Some studies report performance-related benefits, but results vary by protocol, outcome, and treatment area. Muscle performance and exercise recovery are related, but they are not the same thing. An intervention may affect a laboratory measure of endurance without making a player faster, stronger, or more consistent on court.

Whole-body PBM has particularly limited evidence. A 2025 systematic review found only five eligible studies involving 105 physically active participants. Two studies reported improvements in sleep-related measures, but none found a benefit for exercise performance or recovery biomarkers.

That review does not prove that whole-body PBM cannot help. It shows that the evidence base is small and that findings from localized treatment should not automatically be transferred to full-body treatment.

Both timings have been studied, but there is no established best timing for pickleball. Pre-exercise PBM has been investigated for preparation, performance, and later soreness. Post-exercise PBM has been studied as a recovery strategy.

Pre-exercise treatment may be relevant when the goal is preparation or performance. The 2025 meta-analysis found its clearest evidence for PBM applied before exercise, including lower soreness and better muscle performance 24 hours after exercise-induced damage.

That does not create a universal pre-pickleball routine. The research conditions may not match a home device, and a result from one muscle group may not apply to the whole body.

Post-game treatment may be appealing when the main concern is soreness. Research suggests that PBM may support some aspects of exercise recovery, but it does not show that immediate post-game use is always better than treatment at another time.

Some players may include PBM in a broader rest-day routine, but a specific rest-day protocol for pickleball has not been established. Sleep, hydration, adequate food intake, gradual increases in playing volume, and appropriate conditioning remain the foundation of recovery.

It may be worth considering as part of a broader recovery plan for some elbow tendon problems, but “pickleball elbow” is not a diagnosis and the evidence is not pickleball-specific. Pain on the outside of the elbow can involve the common extensor tendon, but other causes are possible. Persistent pain, reduced grip strength, or pain that interferes with daily tasks should be assessed.

A 2021 systematic review and meta-analysis examined PBM for tendinopathy across 17 trials involving 835 participants. In some comparisons, PBM combined with exercise produced greater reductions in pain and improvements in function than sham treatment combined with exercise. Evidence quality ranged from very low to moderate, and the results varied by comparison.

Lumaflex’s guide to red light therapy for tennis elbow provides additional context on lateral elbow pain, grip symptoms, and why PBM should sit alongside rehabilitation rather than replace it.

The important limit is that evidence for a tendon condition does not automatically establish a treatment for an injury caused by pickleball. PBM has been studied for certain tendon disorders, but results vary by condition and protocol.

It depends on what is causing the knee pain. Knee discomfort after pickleball may reflect muscle soreness, tendon irritation, joint problems, a fall, or another injury. Evidence from one knee condition cannot be generalized to all knee pain.

A player with pain that is sharp, swollen, unstable, or persistent should not assume that a light-based recovery tool is appropriate. Diagnosis comes first. A recovery routine for ordinary soreness is not the same as rehabilitation for a joint or tendon injury, and PBM should not stand in for that care.

It may be worth investigating for some repetitive-use symptoms, but wrist pain can involve different tendons, ligaments, joints, or nerves. Repeated gripping and paddle strokes can make the wrist and forearm feel tired, particularly when playing volume or intensity changes.

Lumaflex’s article, Red Light Therapy for Wrist Pain: Does It Actually Work for Golf Injuries?, discusses repetitive-use wrist pain, affected structures, and the role of PBM alongside physiotherapy. The golf context is different from pickleball, but the article may be useful for readers trying to understand how grip-related pain can develop.

Pain that follows a fall, limits movement, causes weakness, or continues despite rest deserves a clinical assessment rather than a general recovery protocol.

There is not enough evidence to claim that it prevents pickleball injuries. Injury prevention is more directly connected to a gradual increase in playing volume, dynamic warm-up, strength and conditioning, balance and proprioception, movement technique, appropriate footwear, and safe court conditions.

Recognizing persistent pain is part of prevention, too. Continuing to play through worsening symptoms can turn a manageable problem into a longer interruption.

PBM may be considered as an optional recovery tool. It should not replace physical therapy, strength training, rest, equipment changes, or medical evaluation.

Do not use reduced pain as proof that an injury has healed or that you are ready to return to play. A 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials involving 205 injured athletes found that PBM reduced pain compared with controls. The two trials that assessed return-to-play time did not show a benefit.

Pain relief can be useful, but pain reduction and tissue healing are not the same outcome. A player may feel better before strength, stability, range of motion, or tissue tolerance have returned.

Professional evaluation is especially important after sudden severe pain, swelling, suspected fracture, inability to bear weight, loss of function, worsening symptoms, persistent pain, or recurrent injury.

For readers comparing PBM with other recovery options, Lumaflex’s guide to red light therapy for sports injuries can provide broader context. It should not be taken as a substitute for a diagnosis or an individualized rehabilitation plan.

Start with the goal, the body area, and the device instructions rather than copying a universal protocol. Recovery from ordinary soreness, preparation before play, and support alongside care for a diagnosed condition are different use cases.

First, identify what you want to track. Soreness, mobility, perceived recovery, sleep, and next-day performance may help you decide whether a routine feels useful. Personal tracking can guide your choices, but it is not proof that PBM caused an improvement.

Next, distinguish localized use from whole-body use. Evidence for one does not automatically apply to the other. Follow the device’s instructions for distance, duration, treatment area, and precautions. More light is not automatically better.

Finally, keep the basics in place. Rest, sleep, hydration, food intake, warm-up, conditioning, and a sensible progression in playing volume do more to shape recovery than any single add-on.

Red light therapy may support some aspects of exercise recovery and may be associated with less exercise-related soreness under particular protocols. It has not been shown to prevent pickleball injuries, heal every sports injury, guarantee better performance, replace physical therapy, or shorten return-to-play time after an injury.

The strongest evidence relevant to pickleball currently comes from broader exercise and musculoskeletal research. 

For a sore pickleball player without signs of injury, red light therapy may be a reasonable optional addition to a broader recovery routine. The research is promising in some areas, but it is not pickleball-specific and remains dependent on the treatment protocol.

Use it as an add-on, not a shortcut. It should not replace sleep, conditioning, gradual training, rehabilitation, or medical evaluation when pain is significant or persistent.

Curious about the science? Learn more about what photobiomodulation is and how wavelength, dose, timing, and treatment area can affect the results.

This article is for educational purposes only and does not provide medical advice. Red light therapy should not replace professional evaluation or treatment for an injury or medical condition. If pain is severe, persistent, or worsening, consult a qualified healthcare professional.

[1] Okhovat A, Ferkel E, Richards SA. “Lower Extremity Injuries in Adult Pickleball Players: A Systematic Review of Injury Types, Mechanisms, and Risk Factors.” Cureus. 2026. PubMed record.

[2] de Freitas LF, Hamblin MR. “Proposed Mechanisms of Photobiomodulation or Low-Level Light Therapy.” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics. 2016. PubMed record.

[3] Canez MS, da Silva LI, Ferreira GD, et al. “Effects of Photobiomodulation, Intermittent Pneumatic Compression and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Muscle Recovery: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2025. PubMed record.

[4] Álvarez-Martínez M, Borden G. “A Systematic Review on Whole-Body Photobiomodulation for Exercise Performance and Recovery.” Lasers in Medical Science. 2025. PubMed record.

[5] Tripodi N, Feehan J, Husaric M, Sidiroglou F, Apostolopoulos V. “The Effect of Low-Level Red and Near-Infrared Photobiomodulation on Pain and Function in Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials.” BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2021. PubMed record.

[6] Haugen ENJ, et al. “Effects of Photobiomodulation on Pain and Return to Play of Injured Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2024. Publisher record.